A group of five people, including a ranger who was familiar with the area, was dispatched to investigate.
The search lasted more than 6 hours. An area of about four square kilm was combed.
Several shoe prints were found in the sand, but they had already been partially erased by the wind.Browse Reference
The size and tread pattern of the sneakers did not match the description of Eric’s shoes provided by his parents.
In addition, no other traces of presence were found at the site. No bottles, no scraps of paper, no signs of recreation.
As a result, the group’s report was unequivocal. There was no evidence that the missing student had been in the specified canyon.
Later, investigators concluded that the witness could have confused Eric with another tourist, as a large number of young people wearing similar clothing were visiting the park at that time.
Tire tracks. 2 days later, another opportunity arose at headquarters. Volunteers who were surveying an area a mile from the parking lot reported that they had found tire tracks on a sandy path.Browse Reference
