Ashley sat several rows behind him.
I sat beside Rachel.
Tyler’s attorney argued that the fence had been installed as part of a landscaping project and that my client had not suffered any meaningful financial damage.
He also suggested that the boundary was disputed.
Rachel stood.
She didn’t raise her voice.
She didn’t need to.
She presented Carl Jennings’s certified survey.
Then the original property plat.
Then the county records.
Then the fence permit showing Tyler had acknowledged the correct boundary before construction began.
Finally, she presented the revised pool drawing and the email instructing the contractor to use the fence as the reference point.
The judge examined each document.
Then he
looked toward Tyler.
“Mr. Bennett, did you know this fence was installed inside Mr. Miller’s property?”
Tyler shifted in his chair.
“I believed there was some uncertainty about the boundary.”
The judge glanced at the original permit.